• Login
    View Item 
    •   Digital Repository Home
    • TCNJ Scholars (Faculty and Student Research)
    • Faculty Research
    • MUSE-Related Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Digital Repository Home
    • TCNJ Scholars (Faculty and Student Research)
    • Faculty Research
    • MUSE-Related Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparative assessment of shell properties in eight species of cohabiting unionid bivalves

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Published version (664.7Kb)
    Date
    2022-03
    Author
    Prezant, Robert S.
    Dickinson, Gary H.
    Chapman, Eric J.
    Mugno, Raymond
    Rosen, Miranda N.
    Cadmus, Maxx B.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract
    Freshwater unionid mussels produce a bilayered shell with the mineral proportion comprising an outer prismatic and an inner nacreous layer. The shell is the animals' primary structural means of protection from predators and environmental challenges; therefore, variations in shell strength and properties may lead to differences in survival. Few studies have systematically assessed shell properties in unionids. A major challenge in such work is separating effects of environment from those of evolutionary history, because ultimately, both can affect shell properties. We collected eight species of unionids within a small area of the Allegheny River, Pennsylvania, that was relatively homogeneous in substratum type and other environmental characteristics. For each species, we quantified shell thickness, including thickness of the prismatic and nacreous layers, and shell micromechanical properties (microhardness and crack propagation, a measure of fracture resistance) in three regions of the shell. Shell thickness varied dramatically among species and was about five times greater in the thickest-shelled species, Pleurobema sintoxia, than in the thinnest-shelled species, Villosa iris. Because all species experienced similar environmental conditions, variation in shell thickness can be attributed largely to evolutionary history. In contrast, microhardness and crack propagation showed little variation among species. Given that micromechanical properties are similar among species, shell strength may be largely a function of thickness. These results have conservation implications, as differences in shell thickness could reflect relative vulnerability to predators and physical conditions.
    Citation:
    Prezant, R. S., Dickinson, G. H., Chapman, E. J., Mugno, R., Rosen, M. N., & Cadmus, M. B. (2022). Comparative assessment of shell properties in eight species of cohabiting unionid bivalves. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation, 25(1), 27-36.
    Description
    Department of Biology
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.31931/FMBC-D-21-00001
    http://dr.tcnj.edu/handle/2900/4027
    Collections
    • MUSE-Related Faculty Publications

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV